What’s Ahead in Healthcare? Insights from the American Hospital Association

The MHA released a new episode of the MiCare Champion Cast featuring Rick Pollack, president and CEO of the American Hospital Association (AHA). Pollack joined MHA CEO Brian Peters to discuss a variety of topics tied to past, present and future healthcare trends.

As the nation’s largest hospital and healthcare system membership organization, the AHA is one of our country’s most respected and effective advocacy organizations. Beyond his strong advocacy leadership, Pollack has been instrumental in addressing historic workforce challenges, expanding healthcare access, improving healthcare quality and safety, eliminating disparities in care and much more.

MHA CEO Brian Peters and Rick Pollack, president and CEO of the AHA, during the recording of the MiCare Champion Cast episode.

After sharing more about his journey to the AHA, Pollack explored the fundamental shifts he has seen within the national healthcare environment and what issues will be at the forefront through 2025, regardless of the outcome of the general election.

“We always work to be a resource to candidates on both sides [of the aisle] and make sure they have the information they need in terms of data and what our positions are,” said Pollack. “Regardless of the election, there are certain issues that are not going to go away,” he added, noting affordability, drug pricing, value-based payment, and insurer accountability as examples of bipartisan issues.

Pollack later shared the important role grassroot efforts play when it comes to healthcare advocacy at the local level.

“People should not be intimidated in terms of engaging their legislators,” said Pollack. “They work for you, and you could be a resource to them. I always used to try to explain to my kids what a lobbyist does – and part of it is being an objective educator on issues where you are the expert and they will look to you for their guidance and counsel…and as a former congressional staffer, don’t forget the staff.”

Peters and Pollack also discussed cybercrime, challenges and opportunities for rural hospitals, the importance of the 340B Prescription Drug Pricing Program and much more. The episode is available to stream on Apple Podcasts, Spotify, Soundcloud and YouTube.

Those interested in learning more about the MiCare Champion Cast can contact Lucy Ciaramitaro at the MHA.

MHA CEO Report — Site-Neutral Payment Policies: The Latest Threat to Patient Access

MHA Rounds graphic of Brian Peters

The worst form of inequality is to try to make unequal things equal.” Aristotle

MHA Rounds graphic of Brian PetersOperating a hospital has never been more challenging than it is today. At the most fundamental level, hospitals are small towns that operate 24/7, year-round, built around expert clinicians, as well as a wide variety of highly skilled employees in multiple disciplines. Collectively, they are tasked with the awesome responsibility of delivering a broad spectrum of high-quality healthcare services to everyone in their respective communities, regardless of their health or socio-economic status.

Our MHA Chief Medical Officer, Gary Roth, DO, often says “healthcare is everyone’s destiny.” He’s right: at some point, all of us – or our loved ones – will require the assistance of our healthcare system. And when that day comes, we as patients can and should expect that we have ready access to care. Michigan hospitals take that expectation very seriously, whether that comes in the form of physician recruitment, retention and call coverage, drug acquisition, facilities maintenance and expansion, or ensuring that the latest diagnostic and treatment technology is on-site.

Here is an economic reality: being prepared to care for anyone, for any diagnosis, at any time, creates high fixed costs. In classic business terminology, hospitals are “price takers” when it comes to government payers, because Medicaid and Medicare effectively tell hospitals what they will receive in reimbursement.

Against this backdrop, our field is currently facing a strong push at the federal level to prevent hospitals from receiving Medicare reimbursement at a level that appropriately recognizes the higher fixed and operational costs referenced above. Referred to as “site-neutral payments,” this policy would force hospitals to accept the same rates as those paid at other sites of care. This ignores the fact that the cost structures between the two settings are very different because hospitals go to great lengths to have the infrastructure in place to save lives every day. Non-hospital settings serve a very valuable but different role, and the reimbursement they receive today reflects those differences. In addition to being open 24/7/365 to all patients – including those with multiple comorbidities, and little or no health insurance coverage, hospitals must have redundant systems for energy and water so surgeries and other patient care can continue uninterrupted when the power goes out or other systems are compromised. Physician offices have no such requirements and don’t bear these costs.

Hospital outpatient departments also provide convenient access to care for the most vulnerable and medically complex patients. These settings are more likely to treat Medicare patients who have more chronic and severe conditions, have been recently hospitalized or in an emergency department and are dually eligible for Medicare and Medicaid. These patients are more expensive to care for and rely on hospital outpatient departments for their increased healthcare needs.

Implementing site-neutral payment policies would be detrimental to access to care for patients across Michigan and the country. If reimbursement is slashed across the board, hospitals will be forced to reduce their costs, which will come in the form of reduced hospital beds, service lines or even potentially hospital closures. This plan for inadequate payment can be particularly harmful for hospitals serving a high percentage of vulnerable patients, including rural hospitals. When a hospital closes services due to site-neutral payment policy, they will close to everyone, not just people covered under Medicare.

I was recently honored to be appointed to the American Hospital Association Board of Trustees and this issue is clearly a key focus of their advocacy work on Capitol Hill. The MHA is joining that effort by advocating with Michigan’s members of Congress, and our message is unambiguous: comparing hospitals with other sites of care is not comparing apples and oranges – it’s comparing apples and space shuttles. More importantly, reducing healthcare costs can’t come at the expense of reduced access to care.

As always, I welcome your thoughts.

MHA Responds to Rand Corp. Hospital Pricing Study in Crain’s Grand Rapids Article

Crain’s Grand Rapids published an article May 16 on the release of Rand Corp. study on hospital pricing. Michigan reportedly has the third lowest hospital care costs relative to Medicare in the country, although the analysis relies on limited data sets and provides an inaccurate view of pricing.

MHA CEO Brian Peters is quoted in the article criticizing the methodology used in the study. He also explains the consequences of being a state with low hospital reimbursement.

“Even if the findings were proven accurate, the study’s results would show Michigan hospitals are reimbursed at some of the lowest levels in the country,” said Peters. “Hospitals are price takers where fixed reimbursement rates are either negotiated in advance with commercial payers or dictated by the government. These reimbursement models put hospitals at a disadvantage because commercial and government payers are insulated from adjusting rates to recognize increased costs and inflation. Hospitals must bear all cost increases with minimal or no payment adjustments.”

The American Hospital Association (AHA) also criticized the report as “a skewed and incomplete picture of hospital spending.”

“In benchmarking against woefully inadequate Medicare payments, Rand makes an apples-to-oranges comparison that presents an inflated impression of what hospitals are actually getting paid for delivering care while facing continued financial and other operational challenges,” said Molly Smith, the AHA’s group vice president for public policy. “Ultimately, the Rand study only underscores what we already know — that hospitals are chronically underpaid for Medicare services. Anything beyond that should be taken with a healthy measure of skepticism.”

This is the fifth version of the study published by the Rand Corp.

Peters also appears in a Becker’s Hospital review article published May 17 that shares the most important lesson hospital executives have learned throughout their career. Peters appears in the article as one of 90 executives speaking at the Becker’s Healthcare 12th Annual CEO+CFO Roundtable on Nov. 11-14.

Members with any questions regarding media requests should contact John Karasinski at the MHA.

MHA CEO Report — Cybersecurity Takes Center Stage

MHA Rounds image of Brian Peters

“There are only two types of companies: those that have been hacked, and those that will be.”  Robert Mueller

“Dear Health Care Leaders,

As you know, last month Change Healthcare was the target of a cyberattack that has had significant impacts on much of the nation’s health care system. The effects of this attack are far-reaching; Change Healthcare, owned by UnitedHealth Group (UHG), processes 15 billion health care transactions annually and is involved in one in every three patient records. The attack has impacted payments to hospitals, physicians, pharmacists, and other health care providers across the country. Many of these providers are concerned about their ability to offer care in the absence of timely payments, but providers persist despite the need for numerous onerous workarounds and cash flow uncertainty.”

So began a letter dated March 10 from Xavier Becerra, the Secretary of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), referencing what is emerging as one of the most extensive and impactful cyberattacks in U.S. history. The scrutiny directed at Change’s parent company UnitedHeath Group – from Congress, HHS, the media and others – is only just beginning, and there is no telling what sort of new regulations, penalties and associated policy change will be the end result. In the meantime, the MHA has stepped up to support our members by sharing as much information and intelligence as possible, and by advocating for flexibility and relief from both private payers and the state Medicaid program.

America’s hospitals are no strangers to external events creating seismic upheaval in our daily operations. Sometimes those events emanate from the world of public policy and politics, sometimes they come in the form of a localized natural disaster or tragic mass casualty event, and no one needs to be reminded of the impact of the global COVID-19 pandemic. But in the wake of the Change Healthcare crisis, there is no doubt cybersecurity now deserves to be on the top of the list of concerns for hospital leaders across the country, and right here in Michigan.

For some time now, the FBI has stated that healthcare organizations are the top target of cybercriminals across the globe, and these attacks have increased significantly in the last two years. Data sharing requirements in healthcare and the connectivity of health information – while well-intended – creates many potential risks for cybercriminals to exploit. Hospitals take these attacks extremely seriously. They are threat-to-life crimes because of the impact they can have on patient safety and access to care, and are formally treated as such by the FBI.

Again, this is not a new issue. A year and a half ago, cybersecurity was the topic for my CEO Report, where we expressed the potential for cybercrimes to cripple an organization. At that time, we saw how multi-national organizations with U.S.-based operations were impacted when Ukrainian government and critical infrastructure organizations were victims of cyberattacks during the Russian invasion of Ukraine. Yet again, we saw how the breach of one organization can cause rippling consequences for an entire industry; one that accounts for 17.3% of our nation’s Gross Domestic Product.

This is why the MHA has been engaged on this topic for many years and goes to great lengths to assist our members. The MHA was closely involved in the creation of the Michigan Healthcare Security Operations Center (HSOC) to help monitor and react to cyber risks with participating member organizations. We also partner with MHA Service Corporation Endorsed Business Partner CyberForceQ, a leader in the field, to assist members who need cybersecurity assistance. For the first time, we also have our very own MHA Vice President and Chief Information Security Officer, Mike Nowak, who works closely with the HSOC, our member CISOs and our external partners in this space. And Jim Lee, our senior vice president, data policy & analytics, continues to lead our MHA Health Information Technology Strategy Council, which is providing meaningful insight on the impact of this latest attack.

It can take months for a third-party review to determine what information was breached and ultimately taken. But from the hospital perspective, it is clear the Change Healthcare cyberattack is yet another example of a breach that initiates with an outside vendor, and those vendors are not always completely transparent and forthcoming with those organizations directly impacted by the breach. One thing we know for sure: our hospitals are victims in these situations and should be treated as such. We want to work with state and federal policymakers and regulatory agencies to prevent cyberattacks, and to root out and punish the criminals who perpetrate these crimes. We will be very concerned about any proposals that unfairly punish hospitals or create new barriers to our ability to provide timely access to quality care.

Our members are going to great lengths to mitigate potential risk. However, more can be done at a federal level to thwart bad actors. Hospitals and health systems are part of critical infrastructure, so our law enforcement agencies need the funding and staff to defend against cybercriminals. The American Hospital Association urged the government to use all diplomatic, financial, law enforcement, intelligence and military cyber capabilities to disrupt these criminal organizations, much like what was done in the global fight against terrorism in the wake of 9/11.

Thankfully, it appears our hospitals and health systems in Michigan have been able to manage this crisis better than counterparts in other states. The work of the MHA and our partners has helped make Michigan a leader in this space and to be prepared to respond to these situations. Our cybersecurity efforts are constantly at work, 24/7 year-round, mirroring the same cadence of our hospitals and their patient care. Yet the human component of healthcare is the most vulnerable. It only takes one individual to not notice a phishing or social engineering attempt for yet another failure that can impact hundreds of organizations, thousands of healthcare workers and tens of thousands of patients. This is why we must remain constantly vigilant as the cyber threat landscape continues to grow.

As always, I welcome your thoughts.

News to Know – March 25, 2024

The American Hospital Association (AHA) is accepting applications for the AHA’s 2025 Foster G. McGaw Prize. The Prize honors health delivery organizations that demonstrate alignment between community health needs and co-designed programs. Honorees forge effective collaborations with a broad range of community organizations to improve access to care and address societal factors influencing health. MHA members are encouraged to apply by May 25. Members with questions may contact the AHA.