|
In
this issue: West
Michigan leads state's skyrocketing Medicaid caseload
Despite
record caseload, EO slashes $40 million from Michigan's 2005
Medicaid program
Congress
returns to focus on 2006 federal budget
CDC:
More Americans without private health care insurance
Editorial:
What about Medicare?
West
Michigan Leads State's Record Growth in Medicaid Patients
Michigan's
record growth in Medicaid patients has been led by West
Michigan, where the number of people getting health care
through Medicaid has increased by more than 59 percent
since 1994, a new state Senate Fiscal Agency study shows.
The
study, "Medicaid Enrollment in the State of Michigan
1999-2004," confirms that more Michigan residents
than ever before are now receiving health care through
the Medicaid
program. One in seven Michigan residents now has health care
coverage from Medicaid.
"At
the end of Fiscal Year 2003-2004, the State of Michigan
had 1,407,712 individuals enrolled in Medicaid," concludes
the study, which was released March 29. "This represented
the largest caseload in the history of Michigan's Medicaid
program."
Geographically,
West Michigan has led the state in Medicaid caseload
growth, the study shows. The five Michigan counties
with the largest growth in Medicaid patients are:
 "For
far too long, too many people have assumed that the face
of Medicaid in Michigan has been the face of urban and
southeastern Michigan, but clearly Medicaid is now the
only source of health care for more than 1.4 million
people across the state," said MHA President Spencer
Johnson. "By far, the counties that are experiencing
the biggest growth in Medicaid patients are in West Michigan."
The
study also concludes that the Medicaid caseload growth
in Michigan is "consistent with trends observed nationally
during this period."
Back
to Top
Despite
Record Caseload, Executive Order Cuts Medicaid
by $40 Million
Michigan's
record number of Medicaid patients and the health care
providers who treat them were cut
by
nearly $40 million in the executive order budget reduction
approved by the legislature in late March. With
passage of the order, the state has slashed Medicaid
spending by more than $540 million since 1998. The governor
has proposed another $100 million in Medicaid spending
reductions in her proposed 2006 state budget, and certain
legislators
are pushing for even deeper cuts.
Medicaid
cuts are eliminating Michigan health care jobs, reducing
federal funding to the state, driving
health
insurance premiums higher for employers, and causing
human suffering
for thousands of Michigan's most vulnerable residents.
"We
just can't afford any more Medicaid cuts," said
MHA President Spencer Johnson. "We can't afford
to deny health care to even more Michigan children, families,
and
elderly and disabled residents. We can't afford
to continue sending Michigan taxpayers' dollars to states
in the west
and south. Michigan already has the nation's highest
unemployment rate, and we can't afford to lose even more
good jobs."
The
MHA is urging the governor and legislature to commit
stable and adequate funding to health
care
over the
long term to protect children and the elderly,
to protect thousands of good jobs, and to keep
employer
health
care
costs in check.
Back
to Top
Medicaid
Cuts of up to $20 Billion Proposed to Help Balance Federal
Budget
When
Congress returns from Spring recess early this month, lawmakers
will get back to work on the 2006 federal budget, with cuts
to Medicaid estimated at anywhere between $0 and $20 billion.
Major
cuts will again force states such as Michigan to slash their
Medicaid programs even more, potentially leaving tens of thousands
of people with no health care in Michigan alone.
Currently,
President Bush, the Senate and House have major differences
over the Medicaid budget. A compromise
budget resolution could include no Medicaid cuts or reductions
totaling up to $20 billion. Because of procedural protections provided to the budget process
(called "reconciliation"), any cuts included in a
joint budget resolution are virtually impossible to eliminate
and require
only 51 votes for passage in the Senate. It is possible that
Congress will not be able to agree to and pass a joint resolution.
If this
happens, as it did last year, individual budget bills will
be subject to traditional Senate procedural requirements and
Medicaid cuts
would likely require 60 votes to pass. To protect the well-being
of Michigan's most vulnerable populations, it is critical that
Congress decides to not cut federal funding for the Medicaid
program.
Back
to Top
CDC:
More U.S. Citizens without Private Health Care Insurance
Nearly
one in five nonelderly Americans surveyed in the first three
quarters of 2004 lacked health insurance coverage at some point
during the previous year, and more than one in 10 was uninsured
for a year or more, according to early findings from the National
Health Interview Survey.
The
survey by the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's
National Center for Health Statistics tracks 15 key health indicators,
including health insurance coverage. Preliminary results also
show that the share of Americans under age 65 with private
health insurance
coverage has fallen since 1999 from 73.1 percent to 68.6 percent,
while the share of those with public coverage, such as Medicaid,
increased from 12.4 percent to roughly 16 percent.
Nearly
one-third (29 percent) of children under 18 now are covered
by public insurance, such as Medicaid and the State Children's
Health Insurance Program, called MIChild in Michigan.
To
help combat the plight of the uninsured and underinsured in
the state, a combination of individuals, health care providers,
and organizations from every sector of society are uniting
May
1-8 for Cover the Uninsured Week 2005. The event mobilizes
communities to highlight the growing problem of Americans
living
without
health care coverage. A news conference, health fairs and
other events are scheduled throughout Michigan during the week to educate
people about the issue and help raise awareness of the plight
of the uninsured.
In addition, an online
guide is available to help uninsured
Michigan residents find affordable health insurance.
Back
to Top
If
Social Security is in Crisis, What about Medicare?
 |
Spencer
Johnson, president Michigan Health & Hospital Association
|
President
Bush, many in Congress and others across the nation are pulling
out the stops to "save" Social Security. They note,
correctly, that a massive wave of baby boomer retirements will
soon put the Social Security fund in the precarious and unsustainable
position of paying out more to retirees than active workers
are paying in. Something, they argue, must be done. If not,
Social Security's reserves will begin to dwindle by around
2041.
But
the financial woes of the Medicare fund dwarf those facing
Social Security, much like an 800-pound gorilla dwarfs a mouse.
Late
last month, trustees who oversee both the Medicare and Social
Security programs reported to Congress that Medicare is in a
full-blown crisis. While Social Security needs urgent reform,
if no actions
are taken to address Medicare's financial problems, the hospital
insurance trust fund will run dry by 2020, two full decades before
Social Security begins to show significant problems.
Those
of us who rely on government-funded health care programs to
care for our nation's elderly patients urge the president and
Congress to put as much political focus and will behind fixing
Medicare as they do to protect Social Security. We must find
a
stable, long-term funding source or significantly slash benefits
at a time when fewer citizens are being covered by private health
care insurance (see related story).
A
human crisis is unfolding before our eyes, yet our politicians
seem blinded to its most ominous problems and challenges.
Back
to Top
|